The AMO is the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation.
HADCRUT4 is a failed attempt by the UK MET to pretend it is warming.
I would have layered the AMO on the HadCru in the “pre” CO2 days, which would then have shown a disconnect in the beginning of the 1975 warming. So my conclusion would have been that some other factor has come into PLAY, not dominance after 1975. The post-1975 pattern similarity would say that the other factor is linear.
Since I’ve already postulated for the Central UK that factor was sunshine hours ..
But I wouldn’t have made the above graph the way you did.
Comment by Doug Proctor — January 15, 2013 @ 3:07 PM
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
The Rubric Theme. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 165 other followers